Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 44% | 46% | |
2 | LU Elaine | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
3 | DUCKETT Madison | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
3 | WU Helen | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
5 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
6 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
7 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
8 | FEIG Sela | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
9 | PABIAN Emilia | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | ||
10 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
11 | FESTA Carina | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
12 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
13 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
14 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
15 | LEE Sophia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
16 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
17 | ZENG Sarah | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
18 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
19 | DONG Angel | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
20 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
21 | YAO Rainie | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
22 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
22 | WANG yining | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
24 | ZHANG Sophie | 1% | 12% | 38% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
25 | YANG Lea | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
26 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
27 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
28 | SAYSON Andrea | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
29 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
30 | LI Victoria J. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 51% | 28% | |
31 | XU Emily T. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
32 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
33 | LI Alexis | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
34 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
35 | CHEN Ashley | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
36 | MARYASH Samantha | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
37 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
38 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 7% | |
39 | LIN Nicole | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
40 | MALEK Zolie | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 20% | ||
41 | JEONG Katie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
42 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
42 | LIU Yifei | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
44 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
45 | BOYNTON Ainsley | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
46 | CHAVAN Arya | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
47 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
48 | XIE Nora | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
49 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
50 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
51 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
52 | WU Yuwei | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
53 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
54 | FERNANDEZ Martina | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
55 | MUND Ruth | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
56 | KONDEV Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
57 | DEHON Inès | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
58 | DHAR Layla | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
59 | KHAN Alissa | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
60 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
61 | ZOLLER Noelle | 1% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | NEUMAN Ella | 1% | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
63 | CROOKS Riley | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
64 | CAO Sophie | 7% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
65 | FAVO Isabella | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
66 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
67 | SENOGLU Irmak | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
68 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
69 | BERNARD Kathryn | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
70 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
71 | MARGULIAN Maria | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
72 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
73 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
74 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
75 | JOHNSON Lydia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
76 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
77 | FAN Grace | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
78 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
79 | NAYAK Esha | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
80 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
81 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
82 | SCOTT Eve | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 20% | ||
83 | HENRY Soraya S. | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 42% | 13% | |
84 | LEOU Korina | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
85 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
86 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
87 | LEE Alyson | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
88 | CHI Claire | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
89 | CARTER Keely | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
90 | ZHANG Victoria | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
91 | PADANILAM Lily | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
92 | KHOST Maeve | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
93 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
94 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
95 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
95 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
97 | CHAN Jolene | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
98 | CHIANG Melissa | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
99 | MANKOVA Varvara | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
100 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 3% | 23% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | |
101 | HU Anna | 2% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 6% | - | |
102 | MUNGUIA Mila | 15% | 46% | 31% | 7% | - | - | |
103 | BAINS Nandini | 25% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | ||
104 | GOLDIN Nina | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
105 | BAIRD Kaleah | 22% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
106 | BUSH Bethany | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
107 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
107 | GUVEN Coco | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
107 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
107 | BARROSO Isabela | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
111 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
112 | KIM Audrey | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
113 | TU Sadie | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
114 | HUANG Neila | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
115 | ONG Lauren | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
116 | DUDNICK Morgan | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
117 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
117 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
119 | COLBY Mercer | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
120 | GOMERMAN Sophia | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
121 | PROBASCO Leila | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
121 | MCGRAW Sadie | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
123 | REN Xinling | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
124 | KIM Karen | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
125 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
126 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
126 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
128 | ZAWADA Milena | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
129 | UEMOTO Lynn | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
130 | MACKAY Katherine | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | ||
131 | WALLER London | 18% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
132 | NAYAK Antara | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
133 | FENG Alicia G. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
134 | HITOMI Nadya | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
135 | LAGOON Miriam | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
136 | BERRIOS Catalina | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
137 | STONE Coral | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
137 | GENTILE Vittoria | 11% | 41% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
139 | KNOBEL Sophia | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
140 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
141 | BARBORIAK Emily | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
142 | XU Demi | 40% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
143 | KANDADAI Lara | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
143 | BANGALORE Shriya | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
145 | WUNNAVA Ellora | 26% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
145 | KIRBY Skye | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
147 | ZHANG Jiaqing | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
149 | POLSTON Ella | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
149 | KALISHMAN Anna | 64% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.