DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HADDAD Justin R. | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 2 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 3 | HITCHCOCK David | D D D V D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 3 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | JOYCE Michaela | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 7 | PICCUS Isaac S. | V V V D V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | TONG Sarah Shen | V D V V V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | PARK Faith K. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 10 | HILBERT Xavier | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | LAMPE-VORGITY Donald D. | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 12 | HODGE Jaydon L. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | STEVENS Daniel | V V V D V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | RUEDA Mateo | V D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 16 | DOAN Joseph M. | V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | TAE William G. | V D V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | SILVA Philip | V V V D V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 19 | LEE Kyungmin | D V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | WALTHER Bryan M. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | NOMANI Shibli D. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | JONES Clinton | V D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 23 | EVANS Allen L. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | ADLER Ethan M. | V D D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | PARK Ian C. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 28 | TRIMMER Colin | D V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 29 | DESAI Meera P. | V D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 30 | LU Samantha R. | D D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 31 | BOLE Samuel B. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | FLO Sena | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 33 | ASHER Valerie | D V V V V V | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 | |
| 34 | SALISBURY Cary | V V D V D V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 35 | LEE Yedda | D V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 36 | SEID Zachary W. | D V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 37 | LU Sebastian X. | V V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 38 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | D D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 39 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | V V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 40 | LI Benjamin | D V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 41 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | COHN Benjamin | V V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 43 | LU Qi | D D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 44 | TEJADA Mikaela Aprille S. | D V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 45 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | V D D D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 46 | MURPHY Thomas P. | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 47 | MONTESI Eric | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 48 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 48 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | D D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 50 | PARRIS Thomas M. | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 51 | REICHBACH Solomon | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 52 | YOON Katherine | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 53 | BAGHA Armin | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 54 | ZHANG Caden | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 55 | BANNEN Nicholas | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.