DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HADDAD Justin R. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 49% | 
| 2 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% | 
| 3 | HITCHCOCK David | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 
| 3 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 
| 5 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 
| 6 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 
| 7 | PICCUS Isaac S. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% | 
| 8 | TONG Sarah Shen | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% | 
| 9 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 
| 10 | HILBERT Xavier | - | - | 5% | 27% | 48% | 20% | |
| 11 | LAMPE-VORGITY Donald D. | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | 
| 12 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | 
| 13 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 2% | 
| 14 | STEVENS Daniel | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | 
| 15 | RUEDA Mateo | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 16 | DOAN Joseph M. | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 8% | |
| 17 | TAE William G. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 
| 18 | SILVA Philip | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% | 
| 19 | LEE Kyungmin | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% | 
| 20 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% | 
| 21 | NOMANI Shibli D. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 6% | 
| 22 | JONES Clinton | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% | 
| 23 | EVANS Allen L. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% | 
| 24 | ADLER Ethan M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | 
| 25 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% | 
| 26 | PARK Ian C. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | 
| 27 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% | 
| 28 | TRIMMER Colin | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | DESAI Meera P. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - | 
| 30 | LU Samantha R. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% | 
| 31 | BOLE Samuel B. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - | 
| 32 | FLO Sena | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - | 
| 33 | ASHER Valerie | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | 
| 34 | SALISBURY Cary | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - | 
| 35 | LEE Yedda | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - | 
| 36 | SEID Zachary W. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% | 
| 37 | LU Sebastian X. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | 
| 38 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - | 
| 39 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | 
| 40 | LI Benjamin | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 41 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | COHN Benjamin | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% | 
| 43 | LU Qi | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - | 
| 44 | TEJADA Mikaela Aprille S. | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - | 
| 45 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | 
| 46 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - | 
| 47 | MONTESI Eric | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - | 
| 48 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | 
| 48 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - | 
| 50 | PARRIS Thomas M. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | 
| 51 | REICHBACH Solomon | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | 
| 52 | YOON Katherine | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - | 
| 53 | BAGHA Armin | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | ZHANG Caden | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - | 
| 55 | BANNEN Nicholas | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.