Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAFOYA Devin D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% |
| 2 | ANDERSON Brendan P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 3 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 41% | 6% |
| 3 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 5 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 37% | 2% |
| 6 | ZHOU Austin | 100% | 98% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 7 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 19% | |
| 8 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 9 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
| 10 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 11 | TAYLOR Jataya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 25% | 2% | |
| 13 | KENT V David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 4% | |
| 14 | HADLER David J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 15 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 25% | |
| 15 | WEISS Mateo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
| 17 | DANIS Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 57% | |
| 18 | KANESHIGE Christina Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 19 | GORMLEY Robert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 20 | KOSANOVICH Jillian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 4% |
| 21 | MUENKE Magnus | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | FRENCH Phaelen | 100% | 97% | 69% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | BARANOWSKI Philip | 100% | 100% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 24 | CLAYMAN John A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 6% | - |
| 25 | SUN Neo | 100% | 98% | 72% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | LEE Jayden J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 20% | 2% |
| 27 | CHAN Andrew M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
| 28 | AGGELER Donovan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 28 | LONG Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 12% | |
| 30 | DARRICAU Henri J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 31 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | ISAACSON Calev | 100% | 99% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | HANEY Kimberly M. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
| 36 | ZHU Riley | 100% | 97% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | BROOKS Justin | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | STOY Patrick | 100% | 98% | 69% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | ALLEN-BRUNS Ryder | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | 1% |
| 40 | SHADE Nadine | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | FREEMAN Katherine | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 42 | EMERSON Zachary | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MILLER Mason | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 44 | THOMSON Sarah | 100% | 49% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | ISAACSON Henny | 100% | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 46 | BLANCHARD Timothy | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | STOY Sophia | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | WEBER Dick | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | HOLLOWAY IMRIE Colin | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | WARD Haley V. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | GOODHEART Mateo | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | KANE Frank | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.