Pasadena Convention Center - Main Ballroom - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Howard | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 85% |
| 2 | SANCHEZ Jacob | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 33% | |
| 3 | HWANG Hagan | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
| 3 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 50% | 11% |
| 5 | TANI Tino | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 6 | KROON Landon | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 7 | XIAO Brayden | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 8 | GU Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 21% | |
| 9 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 10 | IM Tyler | - | - | 1% | 5% | 25% | 48% | 21% |
| 11 | ZHANG KAIQI | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 12 | WANG Edward | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 13 | HAO Johnny | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 14 | HO Alden | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 15 | ARISTOV Ilya | - | - | 2% | 20% | 48% | 30% | |
| 16 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 17 | KOZLOFF Wyatt | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 18 | QI Jeremy | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 2% |
| 19 | LI Ryan | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | LIN Ethan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 21 | FISCHER Noel | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | - |
| 22 | LIU Ryan | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | OU Rigel | - | 2% | 15% | 47% | 30% | 5% | |
| 24 | TENG Lucas | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | KIM Suin | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | LEE Winston | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | WU Dawei | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | GUO Jonathan | 1% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LEE Nathan Uju | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 47% | 5% |
| 30 | LVOVSKIY Roman | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | VO Blake | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | FUGATE Logan | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WANG David | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 34 | CHOI LIAM | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 35 | YPHANTIDES Alexander | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 36 | DOOLEY Atticus | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 37 | LEE Alexander | 28% | 48% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHEN Aaron | 1% | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 39 | GUO Youwei | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | KIM Junseong | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 41 | LIANG Preston | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | SUN Eon | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | LEE Bill King | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | CHIANG Tyson | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | CHEUNG Evan | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | GATTO EnzoPax | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | GONZALEZ Paul | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | NGUYEN Ethan | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CHAN Troy | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | KANG Leo | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | DING Orlando | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | CHOW Tyson J. | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 53 | SLOAN Ethan | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | WANG Xuren | 31% | 47% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | QI Zach | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 56 | NICOLL Andrew | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 57 | LEE Matthew | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | WARD Carter | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | HSIEH Maxwell | 14% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | HAN Kyle | 7% | 34% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 62 | ROBERTSON Beaudry | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | JASPERSON Nolan | 22% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 64 | SINGH Swaran | 58% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | BAKHCHINYAN Brian | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 66 | STERN Kazuki | 50% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.