Phoenix, AZ - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHIN Julian S. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | GODZHIK Zachary | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | BRUK Peter J. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | TSAY Jeremy M. | D V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 5 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 7 | LE Jacob W. | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 8 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | PAI Lakshan K. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 11 | WOO Christian | V V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 12 | BAO Aaron | D V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 13 | KIM Jackson | V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 14 | MIN Eric | D V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 15 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 16 | AIBEL Hudson J. | D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | WECHSLER Jacob | V V V D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 18 | LYNCH Owen C. | D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | KHER Roan | V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | SPINA Joseph B. | V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 21 | OH Jaden | V V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 22 | KIM Ryan Y. | V D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 23 | LIN Michael | V V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 24 | WONG Antonio | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | OH Joshua | D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | CHEN Kyle P. | D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | NGUYEN Liam | V D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 28 | WANG Ethan | D V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | FINNEY Lorenz | D D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 30 | WYMAN Julian | D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 31 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | HOSKERI Anik S. | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 34 | TSAO Lukas | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | ADAMS Jackson | D D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 36 | LLIDO Soren | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 37 | METTAPALLI Tarun | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 38 | KIM Harrison | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.