DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | NORTH Gary S. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | CARTER Austin L. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | DICKENS Robert W. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | SU Caleb | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | LI Benjamin | V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | CHEN Brian | V V V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | HULL Liam | V D V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 12 | TIKHONOV Iliya | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 13 | TIKHONOV Daniel | D V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 14 | LEE Aiden | V V D V D | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 15 | LEE Aiden | V D V D V | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 16 | SUH David | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | WANG Clayton | V V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | HITCHCOCK David | V V V V V D | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 19 | YU Jason | V D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 20 | HEADRICK Jack | V V V V D | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 21 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 22 | HEADRICK Lance | D V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 23 | LEE JoonWon | D V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 24 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | BANNEN Nicholas | D V V V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 26 | HANSEN Lars | D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 27 | SO Lorenzo | V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 28 | GRUPP Tristan E. | D D V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 29 | SWENSON Keane J. | D D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 30 | KIM Joshua | V V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 31 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | D D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 32 | LEE DoWon | D V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 33 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | D D D V V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 34 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | D D D V V | D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
| 35 | YI Nathan | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 36 | YAP Nathan | D D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 37 | WRANA Alec C. | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 38 | MODANLOU Navid | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 39 | WU Shaochi | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | ACKLAND Matthew | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 40 | WANG Aiden | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 42 | BUI Ryan | V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 43 | KONG Brandon | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 44 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 45 | LEE Benjamin | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 46 | EVANS George | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 47 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 48 | SEID Zachary W. | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 48 | WATERS Nathaniel | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 50 | GHAJAR Danial | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 51 | KISH Christina | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.