DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
2 | NORTH Gary S. | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 68% | |
3 | CARTER Austin L. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
3 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 43% | 10% | |
5 | DICKENS Robert W. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
6 | SU Caleb | - | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 27% | |
7 | LI Benjamin | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 6% | |
8 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 26% | 3% | |
9 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
10 | CHEN Brian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
11 | HULL Liam | - | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
12 | TIKHONOV Iliya | - | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
13 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
14 | LEE Aiden | 2% | 25% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | |
15 | LEE Aiden | 16% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
16 | SUH David | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
17 | WANG Clayton | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
18 | HITCHCOCK David | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
19 | YU Jason | - | 4% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - |
20 | HEADRICK Jack | 6% | 35% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | |
21 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | 2% | 20% | 47% | 31% | |
22 | HEADRICK Lance | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
23 | LEE JoonWon | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
24 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
25 | BANNEN Nicholas | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
26 | HANSEN Lars | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
27 | SO Lorenzo | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
28 | GRUPP Tristan E. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
29 | SWENSON Keane J. | - | - | 6% | 35% | 48% | 10% | |
30 | KIM Joshua | 22% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
31 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 9% | |
32 | LEE DoWon | - | 5% | 32% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - |
33 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 31% | 7% | |
34 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
35 | YI Nathan | 4% | 24% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
36 | YAP Nathan | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
37 | WRANA Alec C. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
38 | MODANLOU Navid | 4% | 37% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
39 | WU Shaochi | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
40 | ACKLAND Matthew | 31% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | WANG Aiden | 35% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
42 | BUI Ryan | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
43 | KONG Brandon | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
45 | LEE Benjamin | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
46 | EVANS George | 5% | 62% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
47 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 26% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
48 | SEID Zachary W. | 8% | 42% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
48 | WATERS Nathaniel | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
50 | GHAJAR Danial | 90% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
51 | KISH Christina | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.