Oregon Convention Center - Portland, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAO Nathan | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 2 | WU Wallace | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | DESERANNO Leander | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 3 | WANG Tiger | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 5 | LIU Alex | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% | |
| 6 | PARK Andrew | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% | |
| 7 | CHEN Ryker | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 11% |
| 8 | ZHENG Lerui | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
| 9 | KUANG Cyrus | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% | |
| 10 | CHANG Parker | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 11 | XIE Jayden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% |
| 12 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 13 | DIFRANK Avery | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | JIN Xueyuan George | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 15 | SLAIN Owen | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 16 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | SUN Roy | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 18 | RAU Shogun | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 19 | WANG Mendy | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 20 | ZHAI Alex | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 21 | MURDOCK Koichi | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 22 | XIAN kevin | - | - | 3% | 21% | 56% | 20% | |
| 23 | WANG Caleb | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 24 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 25 | GUGALA Frank | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | PESKIN Kepler | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 27 | LU Brandon | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | CHENG Alvin | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | SUAREZ Lucas | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 30 | JUE Lucas | 2% | 21% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHEN Steven | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
| 32 | SHARMA Ari | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 34 | QIAN Henry | - | - | 1% | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 35 | PAN Howard Haoran | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 36 | LIN George | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 37 | YANG Steve | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 38 | WANG Waylon | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 39 | LI Ryan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
| 40 | YU Jinyuan | 6% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 42 | XU Ethan | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 1% |
| 43 | PARK Avan | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 44 | SHENOY sean | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 45 | CHEN Kyle | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 46 | HO Cameron | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | JEON Joohun | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 48 | DANTON Ryan | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 5% | |
| 49 | WU Silin | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
| 50 | MAZAHERI Theodore | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | MAZAHERI John | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 52 | LEE Conrad | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 53 | DING Sam | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 54 | EVANS Desmond | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% |
| 55 | SONG Enoch | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 56 | SINGH Reyaansh | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | WU Vincent Moxiao | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 58 | WANG Eason | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | CAO Joshua | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 60 | LI Aaron | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 61 | SHENOY Neil | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Derek | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 63 | ZHOU Ezra | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 64 | TROUSDALE Brody | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 65 | KAJITA Grayson | 5% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | ZHANG William | - | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 67 | LAM Lazarus | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 68 | FOO Kingston | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | TROYANKER Makar | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 70 | HUYNH Kaleb | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | LIU Michael | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | ZHANG Aiden | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 73 | ALVAREZ Evan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 74 | LIN Dylan | 28% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | GOLDSTEIN Benjamin | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 76 | LIN Stewart | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | HOARE Gabriel | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | TAN benjamin | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 79 | CREMEL Remi | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 80 | LIU Aiden | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 81 | ROPER Griffin | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | ZHANG Bosen | 9% | 45% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | MENG Andy | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 84 | CHONG Cooper | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | MORALES Tycho | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 86 | YU Ethan | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | SUN Oliver | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 88 | CHEN Solomon | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 89 | SAVAGE Angus | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 90 | TEOH Liam | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 91 | VASANTH Arjun | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 92 | NGO Lincoln | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 93 | DENG Augustine | < 1% | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 94 | LI Jonathan | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 94 | MA Madrid | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 96 | CREMEL Louis | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 97 | ANDERSON Stellan | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 98 | MCBRIDE Sam | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 99 | LI William | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | KOMAROV Jacob | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.