Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% |
| 2 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 3 | GONG zihao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
| 3 | BIVIJI Ali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 5 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 6 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 7 | CHENG Sawyer | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 9 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
| 10 | HENDERSON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 11 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 12 | GOMEZ Emilio | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 13 | WONG Max | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 5% | |
| 14 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 15 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 31% |
| 16 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
| 18 | CIEMINS Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 19 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 20 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 21 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 22 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 23 | LOO Jason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 24 | LIN Brendan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 25 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 26 | SHAH Sohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 27 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 28 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 30 | HU Jayden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | |
| 32 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 34 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 37 | SHARMA Colin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 38 | KIARA Kinoti | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 39 | DEELY Hartigan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 20% | |
| 40 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | LEE Damian | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 43 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | GERTSBERG Eli | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 47 | OREN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 48 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 49 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 50 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% | - |
| 51 | TAYCHER Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 52 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 54 | NAYAGAM Nishant | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 55 | LUCAS William | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 56 | FADEL alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 10% |
| 56 | WONG Mac | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 58 | FORSTED Ian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 59 | MATTOO Dhruv | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 60 | HAYTER Henry | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | MAGITSKY Isaac | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | WU Vincent | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 63 | SO Morgan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 64 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | REILLY Xavier | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 100% | 90% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 68 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 69 | BIVIJI Adam | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 70 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 71 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | SAYAR Luke | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 73 | PATEL Arush | 100% | 80% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | KAPOOR Krish | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | TUNIK Joshuah | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 75 | BURENKOV Matthew | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | SHAPIRO Simon | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 78 | LIEU Nicholas | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 79 | ZHENG Lucas | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 80 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 81 | LIN Jacob | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 82 | FOUX Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 83 | HELD Lev | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 84 | EARLEY Jack | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | VISH Manyu | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | HAUSLER Jayden | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 87 | LEE Korbon | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 88 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 89 | BURG Whit | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | SAUVE Quinn | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 91 | SUH Leo | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 92 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 78% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 93 | MENCIN Thomas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.