Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NOWAK Jakub P. | V V V D D V | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 2 | MARSHALL John W. | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | SUVOROV Yuly | D D V D V D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 3 | MAISEL Simon F. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 5 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 6 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 7 | LENDER David | D V V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | CULLEN Daniel F. | D D V D D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 9 | GUINAN Joseph | V D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | SILVERS Noah E. | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | ROSTAL Scott E. | V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | MAURER Scott J. | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | XIAO Zherui | D V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 14 | OH Kevin Y. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 15 | TANG William | V V V D D D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | MAAS Cameron T. | D V D D D D | V V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 17 | WOZNIAK David | V D V V V V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 18 | SCHULTZ Alex | V V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | TUCKER Brad W. | D V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 20 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | V V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | OH Matthew M. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 22 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | D D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | RHYU Kozmo | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 24 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | V V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 25 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | ZEKO David J. | V V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | CHO Tyler H. | D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 28 | ZUBECK Dominic | V D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 29 | OCHS Bradley C. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 30 | GLASS Timothy C. | V D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 31 | ANA Ionut (Johnny) A. | V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 32 | SYED Saif M. | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 33 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V D V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 34 | WHEELER Mark C. | D V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 35 | MAYER Vinzenz | V V V D D D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 36 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | V V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 37 | HAMILTON Kevin | D D V V D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 38 | STENCEL Andrew E. | D D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 39 | MARTIN Liam N. | D D V D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 40 | SWANSON Dave | V D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 41 | TIERNEY Luke | V D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 42 | CHO Brandon H. | D D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 43 | MARTIN Dirk | V D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 43 | HONG James | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 45 | BRENNAN Charles F. | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 46 | BENYOVSZKY Barnabas | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 47 | KELSEY Ryan | D D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 48 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | V D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 49 | MILLER Joshua J. | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 50 | KRIEGISCH Jacob A. | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 51 | MARCUSON Timothy C. | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 52 | SHAH Manan | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 53 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 54 | CORRALES Nikolas | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.