Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NOWAK Jakub P. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 2 | MARSHALL John W. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 3 | SUVOROV Yuly | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 3 | MAISEL Simon F. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 5 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
| 6 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 7 | LENDER David | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 3% |
| 8 | CULLEN Daniel F. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 9 | GUINAN Joseph | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 10 | SILVERS Noah E. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 11 | ROSTAL Scott E. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
| 12 | MAURER Scott J. | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | XIAO Zherui | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 14 | OH Kevin Y. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 15 | TANG William | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 16 | MAAS Cameron T. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | WOZNIAK David | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 18 | SCHULTZ Alex | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 19 | TUCKER Brad W. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 21 | OH Matthew M. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 22 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | RHYU Kozmo | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 26 | ZEKO David J. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | CHO Tyler H. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 28 | ZUBECK Dominic | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | OCHS Bradley C. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | GLASS Timothy C. | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ANA Ionut (Johnny) A. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
| 32 | SYED Saif M. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 33 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | WHEELER Mark C. | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | MAYER Vinzenz | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% |
| 36 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 37 | HAMILTON Kevin | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | STENCEL Andrew E. | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 39 | MARTIN Liam N. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 40 | SWANSON Dave | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 41 | TIERNEY Luke | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | CHO Brandon H. | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | MARTIN Dirk | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | HONG James | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | BRENNAN Charles F. | 6% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | BENYOVSZKY Barnabas | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 47 | KELSEY Ryan | - | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 48 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | MILLER Joshua J. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | KRIEGISCH Jacob A. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | MARCUSON Timothy C. | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | SHAH Manan | 38% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | CORRALES Nikolas | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.