Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KULDELL Spencer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 2 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 38% | |
| 3 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | |
| 3 | MULVANEY Alec S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
| 5 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 6 | AURAY Phileas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 7 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 8 | MILLER Levi H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 30% | |
| 9 | PRIEST Leighton K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | |
| 10 | YAN Jack P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | |
| 11 | LIU Jonathan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
| 12 | KOKKIN Jack S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
| 13 | RABINKOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 2% |
| 15 | HANEY Vincent | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 23% | 3% | |
| 16 | NARANJO David E. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 100% | 91% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 18 | SCHARDINE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% | |
| 19 | LE Hayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 6% | |
| 20 | WU Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 21 | MURZYN III CJ | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
| 22 | GOLDBERG Gabriel A. | 100% | 81% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 23 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | PARKER Timothy S. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 26 | WINEBURNER J.T. | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | LAI Daniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% | 1% | |
| 28 | HAM Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | FURMAN Thomas G. | 100% | 87% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | SCHARDINE James | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | CHENG Albert | 100% | 74% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | NAGEL Alexander | 100% | 86% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | MCCLUNG Gavin | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | KELSEY Bennett L. | 100% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | YANG Ethan | 100% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | FORBES Wyatt | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | RICHER Tyler | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.