The Fencing Center of San Jose - san jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOYCE Samuel H. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 2 | ROBINSON Samuel | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 3 | LI Ethan R. | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 32% | 2% | |
| 3 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 5 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | WU Steven | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 7 | BECK Brian C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
| 8 | WONG Preston | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | NAIK Saininad | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 10 | SALISTRA Emilia | 21% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 11 | CLAES Thomas | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 12 | SIU Raymond | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 13 | KUO Rylan | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 14 | ACKERMANN Richard | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | MOLLINIER Angel | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 16 | SIRBU Dan | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | XU Yanwen | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 18 | LIANG Jingjing | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 19 | ANDERSON Kai | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | HELGE James R. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 21 | ZGRAGGEN Dale | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 22 | KOERBER Christopher T. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 23 | KENNY Oliver R. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 24 | MANA Arnav | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 1% | |
| 25 | MANSKE Niul S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
| 26 | HOFMAN Haejung | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LEE Emily | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 29 | MARIANI Lou | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 30 | ECHEVERRIA Michael | 75% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 31 | HIGGINS Calvin | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | KUO Michael | 3% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 33 | KLEPPNER Darwin | - | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 34 | FAN Jordan | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.