The Fencing Center of San Jose - san jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOYCE Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 2 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 3 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 2% | |
| 3 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 5 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 6 | WU Steven | 100% | 83% | 47% | 17% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 7 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
| 8 | WONG Preston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | NAIK Saininad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% |
| 10 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 11 | CLAES Thomas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | SIU Raymond | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 14 | ACKERMANN Richard | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 16 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | XU Yanwen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 19 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | HELGE James R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 21 | ZGRAGGEN Dale | 100% | 98% | 84% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | KOERBER Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 23 | KENNY Oliver R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
| 24 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 1% | |
| 25 | MANSKE Niul S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 26 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LEE Emily | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 30 | ECHEVERRIA Michael | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 31 | HIGGINS Calvin | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | KUO Michael | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | KLEPPNER Darwin | 100% | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 34 | FAN Jordan | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.