Kay Baily Hutchison Convention Center Hall C - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
2 | RAJ Jay | - | - | 1% | 12% | 50% | 37% | |
3 | FINLEY Dylan | - | 2% | 18% | 53% | 25% | 2% | |
3 | MARÍN MANRÍQUEZ Ángel Fernando | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
5 | TAN Christien | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | |
6 | FLYNT Hayden | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | - | |
7 | GARCIA-MONTES Emilio | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
8 | GARCIA-MONTES Dario | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
9 | ANDRIC Borna | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
10 | FOURNET-FAYARD Aldric | 1% | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
11 | PETERSON Lucas | 1% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% | < 1% | |
12 | CAPRA Ethan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% | |
13 | KIM Brian | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
14 | BARRETT Austin | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
15 | KIM Andy | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 46% | 12% | |
16 | JOHNSON Chance | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% | |
17 | LI Richard | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
18 | GIDDENS James | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
19 | CHEN Kelton | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
20 | REICHEL Ezra | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
21 | CREBBS Calvin | 20% | 53% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
22 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 4% | 33% | 44% | 18% | 2% | - | |
23 | STANTON Timothy | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 41% | |
24 | DAI Christopher | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
25 | WEST Abraham | 34% | 41% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
26 | CHEZ Nolan | - | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
27 | MCKEE Calvin | 1% | 21% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | |
28 | BOESKIN Nolan | 1% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | DIEP Daniel | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | DANIELS Anthony | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 52% | 11% | |
31 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | 1% | 15% | 50% | 28% | 5% | - | |
32 | NUCKLES Caden | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | SENISCH Isaac | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | - | |
34 | GODFREY Christopher | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
35 | WARMERDAM Joseph | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
36 | JACOBS Jack | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
37 | MILLER Wayland | 48% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | HEMENG Oppong M. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
39 | RAO Saathvik | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
40 | BACCHUS Sheik | 2% | 16% | 41% | 34% | 6% | - | |
41 | MCCOY Camden | 42% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
43 | COWARD Daniel | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | CHAN ShingHang | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.