Kay Baily Hutchison Convention Center Hall C - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | |
2 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 37% | |
3 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 27% | 2% | |
3 | MARÍN MANRÍQUEZ Ángel Fernando | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
5 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | |
6 | FLYNT Hayden | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | - | |
7 | GARCIA-MONTES Emilio | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% |
8 | GARCIA-MONTES Dario | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
9 | ANDRIC Borna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
10 | FOURNET-FAYARD Aldric | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
11 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 99% | 73% | 28% | 4% | < 1% | |
12 | CAPRA Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% | |
13 | KIM Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
14 | BARRETT Austin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
15 | KIM Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 12% | |
16 | JOHNSON Chance | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 5% | |
17 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
18 | GIDDENS James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
19 | CHEN Kelton | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
20 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 5% | |
21 | CREBBS Calvin | 100% | 80% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
22 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 100% | 96% | 63% | 20% | 2% | - | |
23 | STANTON Timothy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
24 | DAI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
25 | WEST Abraham | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
26 | CHEZ Nolan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 2% | |
27 | MCKEE Calvin | 100% | 99% | 78% | 30% | 5% | - | |
28 | BOESKIN Nolan | 100% | 99% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | DIEP Daniel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
30 | DANIELS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 11% | |
31 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | 100% | 99% | 84% | 34% | 6% | - | |
32 | NUCKLES Caden | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | SENISCH Isaac | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | - | |
34 | GODFREY Christopher | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
35 | WARMERDAM Joseph | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
36 | JACOBS Jack | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
37 | MILLER Wayland | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | HEMENG Oppong M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
39 | RAO Saathvik | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
40 | BACCHUS Sheik | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 7% | - | |
41 | MCCOY Camden | 100% | 58% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
43 | COWARD Daniel | 100% | 75% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
44 | CHAN ShingHang | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.