George Mason Recreational Athletics Complex (RAC) - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARCELL Colby | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 2 | MOYD Aaron | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 3 | HUA Catherine W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 3 | XU Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% | |
| 5 | JENSBY Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 30% |
| 6 | SEMP Brannon A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 7 | BARBORIAK Emily | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 8 | WEST-BEY Ahmad | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 9 | HO Alex | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 10 | VLASENKO Bohdan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 11 | LEMERY Marc | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 4% | |
| 12 | PAGAN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% | |
| 13 | ROSE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 28% |
| 14 | MITCHELL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% |
| 15 | ELIAN David | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 16 | SULLIVAN Anna | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | CATLETT III Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 18 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 19 | NGUYEN Anna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 33% | 5% | |
| 20 | RACHAPROLU Divyagnyaan Siddartha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 15% |
| 21 | GOOTY Shravan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | PIHLSTROM Richie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 23 | BAIN Tiernan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 24 | OLMEN Kelsey | 100% | 86% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | CURRY Robin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | CEDENO Andres | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 27 | MICHALSKI Brandon | 100% | 74% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 28 | SCHICKEL Juliana | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | PHAM Matthew | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | PIRAINO Kevin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 31 | SMITH ` Tyler M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | TERRELL Mason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 33 | URIBE David | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 34 | PRICE Jesse | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | PETERS Ella | 100% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | HALL Nathan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 37 | TIONGSON Nicole | 100% | 93% | 57% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | NESTERUK Hope | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | JIN Adam | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MYERS Kenneth | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.