University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Samuel | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 2 | KLINKNER Richard | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 3 | JAIN Samyak | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LI Yunji (Rain) | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 5 | KIM Remington | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | TUBALTSEV Evan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | LIN Jason | V V D V D V | V V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 9 | VERON Darius | V V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | WANG Devin | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | WAGHOLIKAR Prathit | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | HSU Joshua | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 13 | MANA Arnav | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 13 | QIAO James | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 16 | ZHU Owen | D D V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | DILEEP Roshan | V V V V V D | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | V V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | REICHMANN Theo | V V D V D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 20 | TALATAM Arnav | D V V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | GUO Woody | V D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 22 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | V V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | V V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 24 | FAN Jordan | V V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | MA Ryan | D V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | CHEW Aedan | D V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 27 | SU Samuel | D D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 28 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | D D V V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 29 | LIU Daniel | D V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 30 | BAKKEN Archer | D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 31 | FU Adrian | D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | LIU Xuyao | D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 33 | TANG Michael | D D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 34 | CHU Ted | V D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 35 | HAMILTON Travis | D V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 36 | PERSSON Leif | V D D V D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 37 | HIGGINS Karl | D D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 38 | SCHIPPER Johann | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 39 | WU Nathan | D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 40 | YU Brandon | D D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 41 | MANA Sameer | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 42 | GUO Luke | D D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 43 | LI Grayson | D D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 44 | MARTIN zachary | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 45 | JAMES Kaden | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 46 | WANG aaron | V D D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 47 | LIU Max | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 48 | GUPTA Hemansh | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 49 | GORDON David | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 50 | NARAYANUN Advay | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 51 | SIVASANKAR Aman | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 52 | LIN Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 52 | TEJADA-ANDERSON Emmanuel | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 54 | ROZENSWEIG Aner | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.