Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIN Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% |
2 | LI Matthew | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
3 | MATSAKH Philip | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% |
3 | KNIZHNIK David | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 54% |
5 | PO Oliver | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
6 | DONG Richard | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% | |
7 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
8 | YAP Nathan | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
9 | LIN James G. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
10 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
11 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
12 | GHEDINI Luca | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
13 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
14 | TANG Albert | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 17% |
15 | XIE Buster | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
16 | SHAPIRO Leon | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
17 | TAHOUN Mostafa | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% |
18 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 52% | 24% |
19 | SONG Noel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
20 | HE Xiangrui | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 25% |
21 | LYNCH Owen C. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
22 | FINLEY Dylan | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
23 | PITERBARG Maxim | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
24 | LIU Jinning | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
25 | LU Howen | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
26 | SHENG Dalton | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
27 | ARCE Andrew W. | 1% | 7% | 30% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - |
28 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
29 | HUANG Eythan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
30 | MARTIN Darius | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
31 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
32 | HUANG Jonathan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
33 | TANG August L. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% |
34 | XU Andy P. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
35 | LU Royce | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 16% |
36 | GAO Payton | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
37 | TJON Calum | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
38 | CHOI Simon | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | < 1% | - |
39 | LI Aaron | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
40 | ZHAN Kevin | 17% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
41 | CHO Xzander | - | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
42 | CHEN Ethan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
42 | FENG Michael | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
44 | TSAO Lukas | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
45 | LI Ayren | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
46 | TAN Aidan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 48% | 20% |
47 | HUANG Holmes (Shengheng) | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
48 | DALBERG Anders | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
49 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
50 | YAO Bradley | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
51 | MAO Lucas | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
52 | LEE Eugene | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
53 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
54 | YE Gordon | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
55 | TANG Alexander L. | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
56 | XU Ethan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
57 | NICOLL William | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
58 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
59 | LEVY Jacob | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
60 | SONG Bryan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 9% |
61 | BAI Brian | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
62 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
63 | BAKSHI Aman | 7% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
64 | TAM Kyle | 12% | 41% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
65 | TANG Alex | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
66 | ABRAMSOHN Seth | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | MAK Collin Chun Shing | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
68 | TANG Terry | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
69 | LAO Kevin | 16% | 46% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
70 | PLASTARAS Trey | 1% | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
70 | SURESH Rohan | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
72 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
73 | HUANG Chenghan | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
74 | SUN Henry | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
75 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
75 | LI Tristan | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
77 | BLACK Zachary | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | - |
78 | YU Stephen | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
79 | BARBANEL Joseph | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | SENANI Arjun | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
80 | MAGALONG William | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 5% | - |
82 | ROBICHAUD Michael | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
83 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 3% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
84 | BELCHAMBER Mason | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
85 | BALDWIN Benjamin | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
86 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
87 | MA Leon | 4% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
88 | WADLEY Brendan E. | 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
89 | MILLER Dillon | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
90 | HAN Ethan | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
91 | CHA James | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
92 | WALLER Desmond | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
93 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
94 | NICOLL James | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
95 | WUN Jonathan | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
96 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
97 | STRAYER Cody | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
97 | GAO Andrew | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
99 | GLASSMAN Gavin | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
100 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
101 | CHACKO Hunter | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
101 | CORDISCO Rocco | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
101 | POLEPALLI Vinil | 38% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.