University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 2 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 3 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 3 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 5 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 6 | WU Steven | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
| 7 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 8 | KLINKNER Richard | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | TANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | |
| 10 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 11 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 12 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 13 | SIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 20% | |
| 14 | MA Ryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 15 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 16 | WAGHOLIKAR Prathit | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | WU Eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
| 18 | WANG aaron | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | YOUNG Quentin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 20 | KIM Remington | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 22 | DILEEP Roshan | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | WANG Devin | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 25 | HIGGINS Calvin | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZHAO Colin | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 28 | BULLOCK-HUMPHREY Graham | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
| 28 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | FU Adrian | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | VERON Darius | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 32 | LIN Jason | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | LIU Max | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | GUO Woody | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | LI Sean | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | FAN Jordan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | CHU Ted | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | MARTIN zachary | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | PERSSON Leif | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.