Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | BOUDREAUX James | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
2 | MIDYANY Evan | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
3 | AHMED Mohsen | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
3 | TRAN Spencer | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
5 | BAJAJ Nakul | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
6 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
7 | DUKO Phillip | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
8 | KIM Henry | D V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
9 | SOLARZ Arthur | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
10 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
11 | LIU Ethan | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
12 | TU Jinqi | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
13 | LONG Kevin | V D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
14 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | ZENG Andrew | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
16 | HELMY Richard | D D V D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
17 | GAO Victor | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
18 | BRADSHAW Carter | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
19 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | V V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
20 | DOUBOV Andrew | V D V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
21 | OPERT Emmett | V V V V D V | V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
22 | GREENFIELD Caleb | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
23 | BHARGAVA Siddharth | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
24 | ALEXANDER Christopher | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
25 | PARIGIAN Alexander | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
26 | DEGRUCCIO Johnny | V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
27 | LI Morgan | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
28 | MOZZER Nolan | D D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
29 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | V D V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
30 | PAN Anthony | V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
31 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | V V D D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
32 | NG Nico | V D D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
33 | KIM Zac | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
34 | KRUPENKO Gael | V V V V D V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
35 | LY Samuel | V D V V V V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
36 | LI Ray | V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
37 | CAO Gavin | V D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
38 | BHANDARE Veer | D V V V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
39 | LI Jade | V V D V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
40 | DURKIN Hudson | V V V D D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
41 | ARMSTRONG Payson | V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
42 | WITHERELL Logan | D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
43 | DANILOV Artur | V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
44 | CHEN Daniel | D V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
45 | CHANG Ian | D V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
46 | LEE Henry | V V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
47 | HE Yurui | D D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
47 | ROBINSON Garrett | V D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
49 | DYCKMAN Benjamin | D V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
50 | ROSIELLO Francesco | V V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
51 | AGUIRRE Pablo | D D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
52 | NOOL Alexander | D D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
53 | LAVIN Ethan | V D V D V D | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
54 | CHEN Edward | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
55 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
56 | LUR'YE Killian | D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
57 | SHAPIRO Samuel | D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
58 | MIDYANY Ryan | V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
59 | YU David | D D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
60 | LUO Alexander | V D V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
61 | CUELLAR Markus | D D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
62 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
63 | WANG-SONG Evan | D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
64 | WANG Marcus | D D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
65 | FRIZZELL Kai | V V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
66 | OCONNOR Paul | V D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
67 | HANNA Alexander | D D D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
68 | ZHANG Jonathan | V V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
69 | HONG Ethen | D V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
70 | CHO Adrian | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
71 | KIM Louie | D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
72 | WU Matthew | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
73 | FENG Xinmin | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
74 | CHUNG Jesse | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
75 | LEE Kalvin | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
76 | TSIEN Richard | D D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
77 | FOGEL Jake | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
78 | LEE Harrison | D D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
78 | POWELL Horatio | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
80 | LEE Ryan | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
81 | PREVOST Landon | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
82 | TURLIK Midas | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
82 | MCGANN Grant | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
84 | NABI Mikhail | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
85 | AU Joshua | D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
86 | GRANT Aidan | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
87 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
87 | SHI Evan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
87 | ROBINSON Blake | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
90 | BRESLAV Asher | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
91 | MAZEL Antonin | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.