Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | MARX Jackson L. | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | LI Matthew | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | XU Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 5 | LI Aaron | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | AROUH Dylan | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | TANG August L. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | LIEW Jeremy K. | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 9 | LIU Derek | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 10 | TANG Albert | V V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 11 | XU Andy P. | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | ZHEN Ethan | V V V D D V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 14 | LEE Jonah | V D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | TAN Aidan | D D V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 16 | LIN Michael | D D V V D D | V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 17 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V D V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 18 | CAO Ray | V D V V V V | D | 1.7 | 5 | +3.3 |
| 19 | WONG Jackson | D V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 20 | SENIC Lucas | V D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | BOBROW Silas | D D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 22 | KOKES William | V V V D D D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 22 | CHENG Ethan | D V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | JURMAN Therin | V V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | ONIK Ari N. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 26 | LEE Brendan | D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | SHIM Peter S. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 28 | TANG Alexander L. | D V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 29 | LEE Daniel | D V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | ZHENG LEON | D V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | GULCHIN Mark | D D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 32 | KILROY Clinton | D V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 33 | TANG Terry | D D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | HUANG Eythan | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 35 | ZHAO Adam | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 36 | LEE Eugene | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 37 | CHUNG Ian | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 38 | MALHAM Andrew | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 39 | ZENG Rick | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 40 | CHO Xzander | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 40 | ZHAO Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.