Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 2 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 3 | XU Ethan | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | LI Aaron | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 44% | 17% |
| 6 | AROUH Dylan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 7 | TANG August L. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 8 | LIEW Jeremy K. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 9 | LIU Derek | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 10 | TANG Albert | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 11 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 20% | |
| 12 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | 1% | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | |
| 13 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 14 | LEE Jonah | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | TAN Aidan | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | LIN Michael | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 17 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 18 | CAO Ray | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 19 | WONG Jackson | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 20 | SENIC Lucas | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 21 | BOBROW Silas | 3% | 28% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | KOKES William | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 41% | 11% |
| 22 | CHENG Ethan | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 24 | JURMAN Therin | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 25 | ONIK Ari N. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | LEE Brendan | 1% | 17% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | SHIM Peter S. | - | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 28 | TANG Alexander L. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 29 | LEE Daniel | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHENG LEON | 18% | 50% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | GULCHIN Mark | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 32 | KILROY Clinton | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TANG Terry | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | HUANG Eythan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | ZHAO Adam | 1% | 16% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LEE Eugene | 19% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 37 | CHUNG Ian | 49% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | MALHAM Andrew | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | ZENG Rick | 59% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | CHO Xzander | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZHAO Ryan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.