Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
| 2 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 3% | |
| 3 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 3 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 5 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
| 6 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 7 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
| 8 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 9 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 10 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 11 | WANG Devon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
| 12 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 13 | MING Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
| 14 | WANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
| 15 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 16 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 17 | MIAO Quentin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 18 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | NAZARIAN Jonah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 20 | LI Zerong | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 21 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
| 22 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
| 23 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
| 24 | LEE Stewart S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 25 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 26 | LEE Royce | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 27 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | THOMAS Michael | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 29 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | DENISON Declan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 93% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | FU Adrian | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | JU Hanul | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 37 | DAVIDOVICH Eli | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 38 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
| 40 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 41 | SCHERZAY Ian | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | CAMP Ryder | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | BANTVAL Dhruv | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LEWIS Parker | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 46 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | KIM Remington | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | LI Sean | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | KIM Tristan | 100% | 87% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | KOU Mason | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.