Rockland Community College Eugine Levy Fieldhouse - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEWIS Akhil | - | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 2 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 3 | LIN James G. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% |
| 3 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 5 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 32% | 65% |
| 6 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 19% |
| 7 | BADLANI Dev | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 8 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | - | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 9 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% |
| 10 | FENG Michael | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 11 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 52% | 15% |
| 12 | YOON DYLAN | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 12% |
| 13 | GUO Justin | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 14 | WANG Mason | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
| 15 | SHAPIRO Leon | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 1% |
| 16 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 17 | LEE Eugene | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 18 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 11% |
| 19 | LI Ayren | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | MILLER Jordan | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | BAI Brian | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 22 | MARTIN Darius | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 23 | CHEN Ethan | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | PLASTARAS Trey | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
| 25 | SONG Noel | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 26 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 27 | JURMAN Therin | - | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 28 | NICOLL William | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | KAPOOR Aayan | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | MAGALONG William | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 31 | YANG Dylan | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 31 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | GAO Payton | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 1% |
| 34 | BLEIL Tyler | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 35 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | - | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 36 | TANG Terry | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | - |
| 37 | TANG Albert | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
| 38 | PEDERSEN Charles | 1% | 35% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | MILLER Dillon | - | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 40 | KONG Luculentus X. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 41 | SICAT Justin | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | SURESH Rohan | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | MARTIN Mason | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | NADOL Sam | 13% | 52% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 45 | CHO Xzander | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | PITERBARG Maxim | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 47 | NICOLSON William | 14% | 45% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | REZA Farazi | - | 8% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 49 | HUNTER Phillip | 3% | 41% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | BAI Austin | 5% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | NICOLL James | 7% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | GIOTIS Nicolas | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | BARBANEL Joseph | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | MATSUUCHI Lance | 79% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | GLASSMAN Gavin | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHA James | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | CHACKO Hunter | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | STRAYER Cody | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 60 | BUNDUS Luca | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | OEHLER Mac | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.