Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% | |
2 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% | |
3 | CRAPNELL Daniel | 100% | 100% | 89% | 41% | 8% | - | |
3 | BRENNEMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 2% | |
5 | VAN DYK Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
6 | MACNEIL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 3% |
7 | GUILFORD Corey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
8 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
9 | MACNEIL Sydney | 100% | 74% | 6% | - | - | - | |
10 | PLUMMER Ken | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
11 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | 100% | 95% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
12 | WANG Ellie | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
13 | SCHROEDER Abigail | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.