New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% | |
| 2 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 67% |
| 3 | ZENG Rick | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 3 | MO Ethan | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 5 | TOOMRE Kai | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 6 | O'LEARY Colin | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 7 | DIAZ Gabriel | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 8 | SAMUEL Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 9 | SICAT Justin | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 10 | LEE Charles T | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
| 11 | KO Caleb | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 33% | |
| 12 | CHA James | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 13 | ONIK Ari N. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 14 | WONG Jacob W. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 15 | TANG Royce | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 16 | BLACK Henry | 3% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | CHEN kenneth | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 2% |
| 18 | KUO Phineas | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 19 | KRZYWON Dylan | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 20 | HARRA Alexander | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
| 21 | WANG Ancen | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 22 | KOVACS Harrison | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 23 | MA Matthew | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | KIM Daniel | 3% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | XIA Philip | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CHANG Parker | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 41% | 9% | |
| 27 | ULYSSE Jacob | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 1% | |
| 28 | QIAN Zekai | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 29 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 30 | REYES Yannik | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | SMITH Colin | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | BEYDOUN Sam | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 43% | 4% | |
| 34 | LIN Qianzhong | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HART-SYED declan | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 24% | 1% | |
| 36 | HU Daniel | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | LEE Thomas | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 38 | LI Jayden | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHANG Julian | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 40 | KIM Maxwell | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% | |
| 41 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 42 | WALDROOP Cuin | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MARTIN Ahmir | 17% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LIU Ryan | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 45 | FRIEDMAN Marcus | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 47 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | BRAIZINHA David | 19% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 2% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 50 | ZHANG Ethan | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 51 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 24% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | CHOI Hunter | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 54 | LIU jeremy | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
| 55 | ZHENG Austin | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | ZHANG Ethan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LEE Aeden | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | KAYE Ben | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 25% | 45% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 60 | JOHN Meru | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | SCHWERDT Jameson | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | HWANG Jacob | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.