New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | |
| 2 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 3 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | |
| 3 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 5 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 6 | O'LEARY Colin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
| 7 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 8 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 6% |
| 9 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
| 10 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 24% | |
| 11 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 12 | CHA James | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 13 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 14 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
| 15 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 16 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 97% | 69% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 2% |
| 18 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 19 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 20 | HARRA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 21 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 22 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | MA Matthew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 24 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 97% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | XIA Philip | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 9% | |
| 27 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | 1% | |
| 28 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 29 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 30 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | SMITH Colin | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 4% | |
| 34 | LIN Qianzhong | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | 1% | |
| 36 | HU Daniel | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 38 | LI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 40 | KIM Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% | |
| 41 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 42 | WALDROOP Cuin | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MARTIN Ahmir | 100% | 83% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 45 | FRIEDMAN Marcus | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 47 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | BRAIZINHA David | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 50 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 51 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 76% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 54 | LIU jeremy | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 55 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 60 | JOHN Meru | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 61 | SCHWERDT Jameson | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | HWANG Jacob | 100% | 65% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.