New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | |
2 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
3 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
3 | TANG Michael | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
5 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
6 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% | |
7 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
8 | YAVENDITTI William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% | |
9 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 35% |
10 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
11 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
12 | XIAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
13 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
13 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
15 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
16 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
17 | RAY Callum | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
18 | MA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | |
19 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
20 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
21 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
22 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
23 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
24 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 7% | |
25 | JI Derek | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
26 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
27 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
28 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
30 | HU Daniel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
31 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
32 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
33 | AHMAD Uzayr | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
34 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
35 | HU Michael | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - | |
36 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
37 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
38 | LIN Qianzhong | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
39 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
40 | WANG George | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
41 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
42 | MARTIN Ahmir | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
43 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
44 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
45 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
46 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
47 | EHIEMERE Ikemba | 100% | 97% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | |
48 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
49 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 74% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
50 | LI Andrew | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
51 | YUNG Zak | 100% | 83% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
52 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
53 | MANCHALA Vedu | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
53 | MOON Nicolas | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
55 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
56 | DUDDA Kavin | 100% | 39% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.