Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 39% | |
| 2 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | - | - | - | 7% | 40% | 52% |
| 3 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 3 | OH SEAN | - | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 72% |
| 5 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% | |
| 6 | WONG Evan | - | 2% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 6% | |
| 7 | KIM Aiden | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 8 | REEVES Liam | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 19% |
| 9 | MEJIA Matthew D. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 10 | FINLEY Dylan | - | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% |
| 11 | GUTH Joseph | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 12 | TUAN Evan | - | 2% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | HOWLAND Jonas | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 14 | PITERBARG Maxim | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 15 | STRINGER David | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 14% | |
| 16 | CHEREDNICHENKO Ihor | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 16% |
| 17 | MCKINLEY Luke | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% | < 1% |
| 18 | MCISAAC Finn | - | - | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 19 | MAO Lucas | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 5% | |
| 20 | FRASER Rhys | - | 10% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | LI Samuel | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 52% | 22% |
| 23 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | - | 4% | 26% | 47% | 22% | |
| 24 | ARATA Connor | 3% | 24% | 47% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 26 | ATKINSON JOSIAH | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | TAN Christien | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
| 28 | BOYKO Miles | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 47% | 9% |
| 29 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 1% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 10% | |
| 30 | CHUANG Oscar | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% | |
| 31 | GLOVER George | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | SMITH Cooper | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | KUE Temujin | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | MAVANI Krishna | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | GOGOI Vir K. | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 8% | |
| 36 | VANOYEN Dominick | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | LAMBERT Parker | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | - | 2% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 39 | JARCHO Beckett | - | 7% | 39% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | TOWNE Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 41 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 6% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | CHOI Simon | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | GARSKE James | 48% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | IRVINE Brody | 3% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | DAVIS Benjamin | 50% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | BERSCHEID Arthur | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | REECE Oliver | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | LANE Sean | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 49 | HERRERA Xavier | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | MARTIN Dexter | 12% | 63% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | CHAN William | 70% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Hanson | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | RAJPAL Alastair | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | LAKAS Darius | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | REAUME Nate | 20% | 50% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 56 | RUBY Asher | 36% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | HUGHES Evan | 14% | 56% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | NG Gavin | 81% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.