Manhattan Fencing Center - New York, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ISAYENKO Daniel | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 80% | |
| 2 | BEAL Colton | - | - | 6% | 27% | 47% | 20% | |
| 3 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 3 | NEMORIN Rei | - | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 5 | CHAN Ewan | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 6 | WONG Reagan | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 3% | |
| 7 | STOLCKE Saskia | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 1% | |
| 8 | SHAH Sara | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | JOHN Sophia | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 10 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 11 | SUH Leo | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 12 | DOROBANTU Emma | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 13 | ALUF William | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 14 | ALUF Brendon | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 15 | BALTRUSAITIS Lucas Tommaso | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | ZHANG Howard | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 17 | WEI Hunter | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 18 | JOSEPH Azalée | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 19 | TANJGA Luka | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 20 | CHEN Kevin | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | LIANG Morgan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 22 | MITCHELL Lorne | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | FIROOZI Alex | 41% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 24 | SUH Jordan | 5% | 33% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | BELANI Rahul | - | - | 5% | 38% | 45% | 12% | |
| 26 | TERENTIEV Michael | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | STOLCKE Julian | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 3% |
| 28 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 29 | CHO Aston JaeHee | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | SPIELMAN Ren | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | CONNOLLY Edward Bud | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | ZHANG Mark | 5% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | LI Sebastian | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | SITU Adam | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | WIJE Mahamaya | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 36 | VINCENT Yijia | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 37 | ZHANG Benjamin | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | CHOI Ethan | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 39 | NEVELING Felicitas | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.