Manhattan Fencing Center - New York, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | |
| 2 | BEAL Colton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 20% | |
| 3 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | NEMORIN Rei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 5 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 6 | WONG Reagan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 3% | |
| 7 | STOLCKE Saskia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 1% | |
| 8 | SHAH Sara | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | JOHN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 11 | SUH Leo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 12 | DOROBANTU Emma | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - | |
| 13 | ALUF William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 14 | ALUF Brendon | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | BALTRUSAITIS Lucas Tommaso | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | WEI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 18 | JOSEPH Azalée | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
| 19 | TANJGA Luka | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | LIANG Morgan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | MITCHELL Lorne | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 23 | FIROOZI Alex | 100% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 24 | SUH Jordan | 100% | 95% | 62% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | BELANI Rahul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 57% | 12% | |
| 26 | TERENTIEV Michael | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | STOLCKE Julian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 3% |
| 28 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | CHO Aston JaeHee | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | SPIELMAN Ren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | CONNOLLY Edward Bud | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | ZHANG Mark | 100% | 95% | 61% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | LI Sebastian | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | SITU Adam | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | WIJE Mahamaya | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | VINCENT Yijia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 37 | ZHANG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | - | |
| 39 | NEVELING Felicitas | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.