Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
| 2 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 3 | PRIJATEL John R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 58% | 7% |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Logan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 5 | SERAFYM Damian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 6 | TURNER Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% | 3% |
| 7 | MASON Alexander T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 8 | LAUER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 9 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 10 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 11 | HAUCK Samuel J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | SAMUEL Nirmel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | BURKHARDT Krista L. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 14 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | TANG Elaine | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | VAN DYK Mark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 18 | FULLER II Thomas | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 19 | CRAPNELL Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | TANG Ellen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | MILLER Hayden | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 6% | - | - |
| 22 | SAYLER Gordon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 23 | MILLER Brent | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | REEN Stephen | 100% | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | BRENNEMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | MCNARY Sean | 100% | 99% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | FAENOVA Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 28 | TARR Robert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | BRETHAUER Adah | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | HENDERSON Emery | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | PLUMMER Ken | 100% | 73% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | MCNARY Ross | 100% | 85% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | SEWALD Ronda | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | DUTTON Kitty | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.