Fencers Club Inc. - New York, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | - | 4% | 33% | 63% | |
2 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
3 | DANIEL Camron | - | 4% | 27% | 53% | 16% | |
3 | GAO Daniel | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
5 | MOORE Shomari | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
6 | GORNOVSKY David | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
8 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | 1% | 12% | 44% | 34% | 8% | - |
9 | LIOU Solomon | - | 1% | 17% | 45% | 31% | 5% |
10 | KRAVIT Connor BE | - | - | 1% | 12% | 67% | 20% |
11 | WU Jonathan | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
12 | KNOX James | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
13 | CAI Brian | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% |
14 | CHEN Leonardo | - | - | 6% | 29% | 48% | 17% |
15 | STEVENS Daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
16 | XIA Dashan | 2% | 17% | 43% | 34% | 4% | - |
18 | HU Robert | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
20 | NORMILE Jon | - | - | - | 1% | 27% | 72% |
21 | REPIC Oliver | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
22 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 18% | 46% | 29% | 6% | < 1% | - |
23 | XIE Brandon | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
24 | THAKUR Om | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 7% |
25 | LEWIS Malcolm | 8% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 1% | - |
26 | CHEIAN Dinis | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 39% | 7% |
27 | FERRAIOLO James | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
28 | WONG Maximus | 20% | 51% | 26% | 3% | - | |
29 | DOUBOV Andrew | 4% | 27% | 49% | 18% | 1% | |
30 | TSE Maxwell | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
31 | RIM Eugene | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
32 | YU Samuel | 3% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - |
33 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
34 | NORMILE Nicholas | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
35 | KOEPPEL Levi | 4% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
36 | KARIMOV Amir | 7% | 34% | 42% | 16% | 1% | - |
37 | RVACHEV Michael | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
38 | COHEN Jared | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
39 | ZENG Andrew | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | NILSEN Mark | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
41 | CHEN Edward | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
42 | JU Bryan | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
43 | WEHMEYER Devin | 42% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
44 | LI Jade | 36% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
45 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estefano | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 30% | 2% |
46 | LIN Nathan | 11% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
47 | BUACHIE Aaron | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 2% |
48 | RIFKIND Neil | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | - | - |
49 | RODRIGUEZ Reynaldo | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
50 | VIEDERMAN Matthew | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 11% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.