Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 50% | |
| 2 | MOHAMED Murad | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% | |
| 3 | GAO William | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | LIN Michael | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 5 | LONG Connor M. | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 32% | 4% | |
| 6 | MOHAMED Amir | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 7 | LIN James G. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% | |
| 8 | QIU Daniel | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 9 | LIU Eric Y. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 10 | DRESSEL Jet | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
| 11 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 12 | ROSS III Paul D. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | ROSE Ben | 14% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | SONG Austin | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 15 | EMENHEISER Conrad | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 17% | |
| 16 | SONG Bryan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 18 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 19 | LEE Lukas | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 29% | 3% | |
| 20 | TANG August L. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 16% | |
| 21 | PRICE Owen | 7% | 43% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | KIM Minhyeok | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 23 | LEE Jacob | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 24 | BERNABE Rafael | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | WONG Ethan | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | WECHSLER Jacob | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | LI Matthew | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | TANG Albert | - | 4% | 30% | 46% | 18% | 2% | |
| 29 | HOGGARD Carson | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 30 | QIAN Jason H. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 31 | WANG Winston | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | PAN Henry | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | BERNARD Jack B. | 1% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 34 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 2% | 18% | 44% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 35 | LIU Ryan | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | LI Lianhao | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel | 9% | 45% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | KOKE Matthew C. | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | RILEY Colin T. | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | TSIMMERMAN Michael | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | HUANG Eythan | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MAHON-SANTOS Diego | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.