Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | |
| 2 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | |
| 3 | GAO William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 5 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 4% | |
| 6 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 7 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 8 | QIU Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 9 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 10 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 11 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
| 12 | ROSS III Paul D. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | SONG Austin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 15 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 16 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | |
| 18 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 19 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 3% | |
| 20 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 16% | |
| 21 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 93% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | KIM Minhyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
| 23 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 24 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | LI Matthew | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 1% | |
| 28 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 20% | 2% | |
| 29 | HOGGARD Carson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | |
| 30 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 31 | WANG Winston | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | PAN Henry | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 37% | 7% | - | |
| 34 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 35 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | LI Lianhao | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel | 100% | 91% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | KOKE Matthew C. | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | RILEY Colin T. | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | TSIMMERMAN Michael | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MAHON-SANTOS Diego | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.