Brooklyn, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | GALPER Stanislav | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% |
| 2 | EROLCEVIK Doruk | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
| 3 | ALIMOV fayzulla | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 4 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
| 5 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 6 | ARKHIPOV Peter | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 7 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 8 | SU Caleb | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 9 | HORVATH Adam | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
| 10 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
| 11 | HORVATH Mark | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 12 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
| 13 | MAZUR Daniil | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 14 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 15 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 16 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 17 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 18 | ATKINS Levi H. | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 19 | BURATTI Fausto | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 20 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 21 | KIM Henry | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
| 22 | ZHAO Michael(Junyi) | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | LIPPMAN Jake | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 24 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | HURSEVER Timur | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 27 | RUBIN Daniel | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 28 | MATVEEV Valentin S. | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 29 | LIVERANT Skyler J. | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 30 | CHEN Allen | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 31 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 32 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 33 | YUE Hongrui | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
| 34 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | ZHUANG William | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | DONG Haiyi | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | SOKOL Luke | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | CHEN Bowen | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | KUDIEROVA Anastasiia | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 44 | WANG Jiacheng | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 45 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 46 | HELMY Richard | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 47 | VAN JAARSVELD Leo | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 48 | HELLINGER Ben | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 49 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | BOTVINNIK Lev | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 51 | MEYER Rachel | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 51 | ZHANG Albert | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 51 | STEVENS Owen | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 54 | ZHAO Liren | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 55 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 56 | WANG Aaron | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 57 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 58 | ZHANG Jason | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 59 | MEYER Rebecca | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 59 | LIU Zicheng | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 62 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | NG Nico | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 64 | BERES Mark | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.