Brooklyn, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | GALPER Stanislav | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% |
2 | EROLCEVIK Doruk | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
3 | ALIMOV fayzulla | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
4 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
5 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
6 | ARKHIPOV Peter | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
7 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
8 | SU Caleb | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
9 | HORVATH Adam | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
10 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
11 | HORVATH Mark | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
12 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
13 | MAZUR Daniil | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
14 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
15 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
16 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
17 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
18 | ATKINS Levi H. | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
19 | BURATTI Fausto | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
20 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
21 | KIM Henry | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
22 | ZHAO Michael(Junyi) | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
23 | LIPPMAN Jake | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
24 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
25 | HURSEVER Timur | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
26 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
27 | RUBIN Daniel | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
28 | MATVEEV Valentin S. | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
29 | LIVERANT Skyler J. | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
30 | CHEN Allen | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
31 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
32 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
33 | YUE Hongrui | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
34 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
35 | ZHUANG William | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
36 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
37 | DONG Haiyi | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
38 | SOKOL Luke | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
39 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
40 | CHEN Bowen | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
41 | KUDIEROVA Anastasiia | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - |
42 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
43 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
44 | WANG Jiacheng | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
45 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
46 | HELMY Richard | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
47 | VAN JAARSVELD Leo | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
48 | HELLINGER Ben | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
49 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
50 | BOTVINNIK Lev | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
51 | MEYER Rachel | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
51 | ZHANG Albert | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
51 | STEVENS Owen | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
54 | ZHAO Liren | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
55 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
56 | WANG Aaron | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
57 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
58 | ZHANG Jason | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
59 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
59 | MEYER Rebecca | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
59 | LIU Zicheng | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
62 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
63 | NG Nico | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
64 | BERES Mark | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.