NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% | |
| 2 | PUTHOFF Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 13% |
| 3 | WANG Dina C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 7% | |
| 3 | XU Charlene | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 5 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | |
| 6 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 4% | |
| 7 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 8 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | YOUM Amelia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 10 | YIN Emily | 100% | 95% | 67% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 11 | XU Selina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
| 12 | LIN Alexis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% |
| 13 | ZHANG Caroline | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 14 | XING Melly | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | TAO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
| 16 | HUANG Gabrielle | 100% | 79% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
| 17 | LI Christina | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 18 | CHOI Evie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 8% | |
| 19 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 20 | PAEK Mila | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | XU Alisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% | |
| 22 | GENG Emma | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | LIANG Jasmine | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | LI Beatrice | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | FENG Claire | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | CHAN Hailey | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | GOMEZ Amelia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 28 | PAEK Ellie | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | ZHENG Emma | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 30 | ZHANG Priscilla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 8% | |
| 31 | LE Minnie | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | DOMINIK Eliana | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | JU Victoria | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | REILLY Carys | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WANG Christina | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 18% | 1% | |
| 36 | DONG Katelyn | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | CHOE Regina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 38 | LU Miaotian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 39 | XU Selina (Tai Ran) | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | O’HAGAN Riley | 100% | 98% | 79% | 35% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | KIM Lael | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | ZHANG Ziru | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MILLER Anna | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.