NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YIN Chloe | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
| 2 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 50% | 13% |
| 3 | WANG Dina C. | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 42% | 7% | |
| 3 | XU Charlene | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 5 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
| 6 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | 3% | 15% | 39% | 39% | 4% | |
| 7 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
| 8 | CHAN Jolene | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | YOUM Amelia | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 10 | YIN Emily | 5% | 28% | 45% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 11 | XU Selina | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 12 | LIN Alexis | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 13 | ZHANG Caroline | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 14 | XING Melly | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 15 | TAO Isabella | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 16 | HUANG Gabrielle | 21% | 46% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 17 | LI Christina | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 18 | CHOI Evie | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% | |
| 19 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 20 | PAEK Mila | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | XU Alisa | - | - | 4% | 22% | 49% | 25% | |
| 22 | GENG Emma | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | LIANG Jasmine | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | LI Beatrice | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 25 | FENG Claire | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 26 | CHAN Hailey | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | GOMEZ Amelia | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | PAEK Ellie | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | ZHENG Emma | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 30 | ZHANG Priscilla | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 39% | 8% | |
| 31 | LE Minnie | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | DOMINIK Eliana | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | JU Victoria | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | REILLY Carys | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WANG Christina | - | 6% | 30% | 45% | 17% | 1% | |
| 36 | DONG Katelyn | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | CHOE Regina | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 38 | LU Miaotian | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 39 | XU Selina (Tai Ran) | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | O’HAGAN Riley | 2% | 20% | 43% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | KIM Lael | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | ZHANG Ziru | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MILLER Anna | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.