NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Carol | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
| 2 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
| 3 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 3 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 5 | EYER Brooke | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 9% |
| 6 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 9% |
| 7 | CAO Amelie | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 16% | 1% |
| 8 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
| 9 | CAI Ilana | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 10 | HUANG Sophie | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 8% |
| 11 | YIN Chloe | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 5% | |
| 12 | WANG Dina C. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
| 13 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% |
| 14 | FENG Audrey | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 15 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 19% |
| 16 | BULAVA Tatyana | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | OLAWOYE Jadesola | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 18 | BRAVO ORTEGA Astrid | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 19 | EPSTEIN Naomi | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | TAO Isabella | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | KRAHE Annika | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% | |
| 22 | XU Charlene | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | FENG Claire | 8% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | JI DORA | 17% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | REILLY Carys | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | YOUM Amelia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | PAEK Mila | 20% | 45% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | HUANG Gabrielle | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | ZHANG Caroline | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | LIANG Jasmine | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | ZHENG Emma | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | LI Christina | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LIN Alexis | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | CHOI Evie | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LU Miaotian | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Priscilla | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | GOMEZ Sofia | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | YIN Emily | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | LAU Victoria | 30% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.