NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Hanzhi （Shawn） | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 2 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 3 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
| 3 | LYCHKO Maksym | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 5 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 6 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 7 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 8 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | CHEN Luowen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 10 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 11 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
| 12 | SONG Changze | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 13 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 14 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
| 15 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 16 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 17 | LI Morgan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 18 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 20 | LIN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 21 | ZHANG Dinghao | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 24 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 25 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 26 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 27 | WONG Maximus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | GAO Victor | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | ALEXANDER Christopher | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 31 | BO Genero | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | LI Jade | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% | |
| 33 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
| 34 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 36 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 9% | |
| 38 | HU Anton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 39 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | ALAM Rajan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | HENNESSY Levon | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 46 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 48 | LEE Anton | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | HAN Keyi | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | NG Nico | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 51 | LEE Wyatt | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | KIM Tae | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 53 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZHAI Christopher | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
| 57 | GU Eric | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 59 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 60 | WANG Eason | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 61 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | EVANS George | 100% | 95% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 64 | LEE Kalvin | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | EVANS Joseph | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 69 | TOWNSHEND Connor | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 70 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 71 | KIM Zac | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 72 | DESAI Jay | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.