Danvers Indoor Sports - Danvers, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG DINA C. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
| 2 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
| 3 | YIN Chloe | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 3 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 5 | BYK Karalina | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 25% | 3% | |
| 6 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 7 | GE Deanna | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | - |
| 10 | GENG Emma | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 11 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 12 | LI Christina | 10% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | MA Sophia | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | YIN Emily | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | SUN Erin | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 16 | CHOI Evie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | BENNETT Emi | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 18 | WANG Wenxi | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 19 | WU Annie | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | KIRBY Emelie | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | ZHU Audrey | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | LU Miaotian | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | HONG Mabel | - | < 1% | 8% | 36% | 41% | 14% | - |
| 24 | HWANG Jiahn | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | JIN Serena | 1% | 10% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | MILLER Anna | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.