Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAHER Yasmine | - | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 34% | 15% |
| 2 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 3 | HANKINS Morgan | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 3 | SCANLAN Claire | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | XU Celina | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 6 | GUAN Isabella | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 7 | ZHUANG Lauren | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 8 | MITTMAN Lela Z. | 1% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 9 | SHAHRIL Natalia | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 48% | 38% |
| 10 | LEREE Fernanda | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 11 | KAUSHISH Sara | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 12 | PRIMES Amanda M. | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 13 | SALISTRA Emilia | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 6% |
| 14 | REED Katya | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | DAVIS Julia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 16 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | < 1% | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 17 | KANE Chloe | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 18 | MING YUE | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 19 | LI Danchen | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 20 | GAGARING Genia | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | WELBORN Kathrina | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 23 | CHANG Abigail | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 5% | 1% |
| 24 | MADRID Maureen | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 25 | SUCHOSKI Annika | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 26 | HAU Olivia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | BENNETT Vienne | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 28 | KROTZ Gemma | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | SUN Karolyn | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CHAN Allison M. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 2% |
| 31 | LIN Isabel | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | DAHER Nadia | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 33 | HERNANDEZ-CHENG Isabel | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 34 | CHEN Jingyun | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 14% | |
| 35 | MOHEBI Neeka | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | RALSTON Katherine | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 37 | JAMES Ashley | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 38 | HASIM Eurietta | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 40 | LEE Valerie | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | BLASKO Judit | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SPOHN Mary S. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 43 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | SALAZAR Emma | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 45 | BLAETZ Isadora | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 46 | POON Desiree | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 47 | HONG Yuehua | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MACARR Madalyn A. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | GURROLA Michal | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | TAMIR Annika | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | ZHAO Yanning | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | MARIKOS Christina | 28% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | ACE Amy | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHETTY Nandita | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.