Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAHER Yasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 15% |
| 2 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 3 | HANKINS Morgan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 49% | 15% |
| 3 | SCANLAN Claire | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | XU Celina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 5% |
| 6 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 7 | ZHUANG Lauren | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 8 | MITTMAN Lela Z. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | SHAHRIL Natalia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% |
| 10 | LEREE Fernanda | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | KAUSHISH Sara | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 12 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 13 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% |
| 14 | REED Katya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | DAVIS Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 16 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 17 | KANE Chloe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 18 | MING YUE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 19 | LI Danchen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 20 | GAGARING Genia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | WELBORN Kathrina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 97% | 81% | 52% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 24 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 25 | SUCHOSKI Annika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 26 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | BENNETT Vienne | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | KROTZ Gemma | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | SUN Karolyn | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CHAN Allison M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
| 31 | LIN Isabel | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 32 | DAHER Nadia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 5% |
| 33 | HERNANDEZ-CHENG Isabel | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 34 | CHEN Jingyun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
| 35 | MOHEBI Neeka | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | RALSTON Katherine | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 37 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 38 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | LEE Valerie | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | BLASKO Judit | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SPOHN Mary S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | SALAZAR Emma | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 45 | BLAETZ Isadora | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | POON Desiree | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | HONG Yuehua | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MACARR Madalyn A. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | GURROLA Michal | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | TAMIR Annika | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | ZHAO Yanning | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | MARIKOS Christina | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | ACE Amy | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHETTY Nandita | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.