Fortune ROC/RJCC/RYC

Y-14 Men's Épée

Saturday, August 31, 2024 at 12:30 PM

Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GACIOCH Noah - - 3% 13% 31% 36% 16%
2 WU Steven - - - 2% 17% 45% 36%
3 PARK Sangwook - - - 3% 16% 41% 40%
3 DENG haoyu - - 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
5 HERBRANDSON Luke - - 3% 12% 29% 37% 19%
6 WU Johnny y. - - 1% 6% 22% 41% 30%
7 SU Samuel - 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
8 WANG Devin - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 4%
9 MA Ryan - 2% 9% 27% 36% 22% 4%
10 MAXU Tiger - 1% 5% 20% 36% 30% 8%
11 LOUIE Joseph - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
12 LIANG Donny - - 2% 10% 28% 38% 21%
13 PARKE Nathaniel - 1% 5% 17% 33% 32% 12%
14 QIAO James 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
15 AVETISIAN Michael - - 4% 15% 32% 35% 15%
16 BROWN Korbyn 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
17 KIM Alexander - - - 2% 12% 39% 48%
18 YAO Tristan - 2% 10% 25% 34% 24% 7%
19 MA Ciel 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
20 LEE Damien - - - 4% 18% 42% 35%
20 AUSTIN Atlas - - 2% 12% 40% 36% 9%
22 SUROV Alexander 2% 11% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
23 KIM Evan 3% 14% 29% 31% 18% 5% 1%
24 DIETZ Adam 2% 13% 31% 33% 16% 3% -
25 RONG Gordon - - 1% 7% 32% 44% 16%
26 FEI Victor - - - 4% 18% 41% 36%
27 RAHMAN Zayd - 2% 12% 29% 35% 18% 3%
28 ZHANG Luqi 1% 6% 20% 32% 28% 12% 2%
29 WOO Lucas - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
30 ADDLEMAN Joshua - 3% 15% 34% 33% 13% 2%
31 JAMES Kaden 7% 27% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
32 SCHWARTZMAN Ethan 4% 20% 35% 28% 12% 2% -
33 WANG Joey - - - 1% 10% 37% 52%
34 ENG Kyler - 1% 5% 20% 36% 30% 9%
35 ZHANG Austin 1% 10% 25% 33% 22% 8% 1%
36 WHITE Ryden - 4% 15% 30% 31% 16% 3%
37 BERTEL Florian - 3% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
37 MOSLEY Wally 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
39 DU Evan - 2% 9% 24% 36% 24% 5%
40 KIM Ian - 1% 7% 25% 39% 25% 4%
41 KIM Remington - 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3%
42 WONG Aaron 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
43 MENG Haoyi 1% 5% 20% 34% 29% 10% 1%
44 GREENMAN Duke - 1% 7% 23% 37% 26% 5%
45 VOO Lucas 2% 12% 27% 32% 20% 6% 1%
46 RAHMAN Ali - 4% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3%
47 FU Adrian - 3% 12% 27% 33% 20% 5%
48 LI Grayson 5% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
49 WU Nathan - 3% 15% 32% 32% 14% 2%
50 LEE Damon 4% 22% 39% 28% 7% 1% -
51 AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
52 BALUCAN Caelus 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
53 WONG Vansen 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
53 FU Nolan - 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 5%
55 GADHVI Darius 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4% -
56 GUO Luke 5% 20% 33% 28% 12% 3% -
57 BAUMAN Colin 5% 20% 33% 28% 12% 3% -
58 SCHWITZER Eliot 1% 7% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
59 WANG Lucas - 3% 13% 28% 33% 19% 4%
60 HUA Nolan 3% 15% 30% 31% 17% 5% -
61 WANG Dylan 11% 39% 35% 13% 2% - -
62 WANG Kyle 4% 19% 33% 28% 13% 3% -
63 CHEN Aiden < 1% 2% 9% 24% 34% 25% 7%
64 SHIH Derek 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
65 LIU Aiden 2% 13% 29% 31% 18% 5% 1%
66 KOU Mason 5% 19% 32% 28% 13% 3% -
67 WONG Alexander 3% 15% 30% 31% 17% 5% 1%
68 HAMILTON Travis 2% 12% 28% 32% 19% 6% 1%
69 TOUSSAINT Wizard 1% 6% 22% 35% 26% 8% 1%
70 HUR Tyson 48% 39% 12% 2% - - -
71 LEE Davidson 22% 38% 27% 10% 2% - -
72 LIN Daniel 14% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
73 RONG Marcus 2% 13% 30% 33% 17% 4% -
74 DAVIDSON James 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
75 YU Haoyun 12% 34% 34% 16% 4% - -
76 NGUYEN Ethan V. 12% 32% 33% 17% 5% 1% -
77 FERRIERE Theo 16% 37% 32% 13% 2% - -
78 TAVERNA Matteo 19% 39% 29% 11% 2% - -
79 LIU Xuyao 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
80 KHUSHRAJ Rohan 4% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
80 JU Shang 11% 30% 33% 19% 6% 1% -
82 LIU Max 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 2% -
83 MILLER Xavier 12% 35% 36% 15% 2% - -
84 KLINKNER Charlie 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
85 DING Max 1% 8% 23% 33% 24% 9% 1%
86 DENG Destin 6% 23% 34% 25% 10% 2% -
87 PARRA Lucas 50% 39% 10% 1% - - -
88 MA kevin 8% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
89 CROY Felix 35% 41% 19% 5% 1% - -
90 PARK Sihoon 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
91 BRIDGEWATER Beckman 2% 19% 37% 29% 10% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.