Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 2 | WU Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% |
| 3 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 3 | DENG haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 5 | HERBRANDSON Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 19% |
| 6 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 7 | SU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 8 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 9 | MA Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 10 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 11 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 8% |
| 12 | LIANG Donny | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
| 13 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 14 | QIAO James | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 15 | AVETISIAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 15% |
| 16 | BROWN Korbyn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 18 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| 19 | MA Ciel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | LEE Damien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 20 | AUSTIN Atlas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | 9% |
| 22 | SUROV Alexander | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | KIM Evan | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 24 | DIETZ Adam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 16% |
| 26 | FEI Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% |
| 27 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 28 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | WOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 30 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 34 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 35 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | WHITE Ryden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | BERTEL Florian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 37 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 5% |
| 40 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 41 | KIM Remington | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 42 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 43 | MENG Haoyi | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | GREENMAN Duke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 5% |
| 45 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 47 | FU Adrian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 48 | LI Grayson | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | LEE Damon | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | BALUCAN Caelus | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 55 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 56 | GUO Luke | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | BAUMAN Colin | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 58 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 60 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 61 | WANG Dylan | 100% | 89% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | WANG Kyle | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 63 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 64 | SHIH Derek | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 66 | KOU Mason | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 67 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 68 | HAMILTON Travis | 100% | 98% | 85% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 69 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | HUR Tyson | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | LEE Davidson | 100% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 74 | DAVIDSON James | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 76 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 77 | FERRIERE Theo | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | TAVERNA Matteo | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 80 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 80 | JU Shang | 100% | 89% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | LIU Max | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 83 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | KLINKNER Charlie | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | DING Max | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 86 | DENG Destin | 100% | 94% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 87 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | MA kevin | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 89 | CROY Felix | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | PARK Sihoon | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | BRIDGEWATER Beckman | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.