Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CARDENAS Lucas | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 2 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 3 | CHEN Jayden | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 3 | CHEN Leetyan | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 21% |
| 6 | KIM Gene | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 7 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | GONZALEZ Kian | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 9 | LI Tristan | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 10 | SINGLETON Aman | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 11 | DADE MAXIMUS | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 11 | COHEN Nathan | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 13 | DECKER Hunter | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 14 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 15 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 3% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | WANG Marcus | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 17 | LESCURE Dimitri | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 18 | MANGAN Hunter | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | TESFAYE Elias | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | VINOTH Aaron | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 21 | HERNDON Liam | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 22 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 23 | HSU Joshua | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 24 | YILMAZ Tarik | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 25 | RIM Eugene | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 26 | CAFASSO Alexander | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 27 | WANG Jiacheng | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | SOOS Whitman | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 30 | GINZBURG Adam | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 31 | TUMULA Arihaan | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | HUANG Ethan | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | HENNESSY Levon | 3% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 34 | IBANEZ Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | LIU Zicheng | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 35 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 37 | LU Haoyang | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | RAO Neil | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 39 | YANG Gary | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 40 | MASSIE Jay Thomas | 10% | 34% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | SATHYAN Dev | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | WANG aaron | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | KUANG Aaron | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 44 | NEWSOM Finn | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | OBREBSKI Kevin | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 46 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 47 | KROPP Wesley | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
| 48 | PEREZ Daniel | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | RODRIGUEZ Alejandro | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 50 | ADDYSON Aidan | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | JIANG Harry | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 52 | KNYSH IURII | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | FOGEL Jake | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | NAM Nathaniel | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 55 | CLARK Max | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | FALKIEWICZ Alec R. | 14% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | DEDMAN Dexter | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | OLSON Joseph | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 59 | CHO Sean | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | GONIMA Francisco | 21% | 49% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | TIEKING Noah | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 63 | FENG Xinmin | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.