Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | |
| 2 | LIN Youlong | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 3 | CHEN Matthew | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 28% |
| 3 | PARK Rion | - | - | 4% | 27% | 52% | 17% | |
| 5 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 6 | PONS Diego | - | - | 1% | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
| 7 | LO Preston | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
| 8 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
| 9 | WONG Yuheng Isaac | - | - | - | 7% | 41% | 41% | 10% |
| 10 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 11 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 12 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% |
| 13 | WONG Evan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% |
| 14 | CHONG Tristan | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 15 | NGUYEN Martin | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 45% |
| 16 | KIM Aiden | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 17 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 13% |
| 18 | KETTELLE John | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 4% |
| 19 | HUANG Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 20 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 21 | ZHANG Jacob | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% |
| 22 | SALEH Omar | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 40% | 36% |
| 23 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
| 24 | YI William | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 39% | 7% | |
| 25 | LIU William | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 26 | LING Carson Jr | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 27 | BIELER Mason | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 28 | WU Trevor | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
| 29 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 4% | 33% | 47% | 15% |
| 30 | ZHOU Ryan | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 31 | QIU Zhaocheng | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 32 | GORDON William L. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% |
| 33 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 61% | |
| 34 | BI Ryan | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 36 | LI Samuel | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 37 | BAE Eugene | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 38 | TULYAG Azim | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
| 40 | KIM Jonah | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | HARRIS Julien | - | 9% | 37% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CAJERO Luis O. | 3% | 25% | 50% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | CHOI Ethan | - | 6% | 28% | 46% | 18% | 2% | |
| 44 | CHAN Ian | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 41% | 7% | |
| 45 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
| 46 | YUE Jackson | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 47 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 48 | WONG Braxton | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | LAM Nicolas | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 31% | 6% |
| 50 | PE Noah | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 50 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | CHANG Nathan | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 53 | ORNELAS Matteo | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 53 | ONG Nicholas | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | BORG Matthew | - | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 1% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LEHTINEN Axel | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | ZHAN Kevin | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 59 | NEICE William | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 60 | LI Daniel | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 61 | PARK William | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 62 | JACOB Ezra | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 63 | TSOI Spencer | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 64 | HE Ian | 23% | 52% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 65 | LEE Christopher | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | LO Ernest | 16% | 45% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 67 | ANDRADE Cedric | 9% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | PETROV Mikhail | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 69 | HE Bourne | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | PARK David | 8% | 33% | 42% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | WU Lucas | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 71 | CHIN MinSeop | 8% | 47% | 36% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 73 | SUN Neo | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 2% | 21% | 48% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | YANG Charles | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 75 | GRINER Kevin | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | BURLINGAME Owen | 18% | 49% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | FLANAGAN Miles | 6% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 80 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 32% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 81 | NG Andrew | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 82 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 49% | 42% | 9% | - | - | - | |
| 83 | SALEH Ali | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 84 | TSAY Jordan R. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 85 | KAUSHISH Rayirth | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | CHEN Fengyi(James) | 10% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | KARPMAN Benny | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | LI Jake | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 89 | CHEN Owen | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | FOY Grant | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 91 | FU Owen | 14% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | TURNER Finian | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 94 | HUANG Nathan | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | 61% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 96 | KIM Teo | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 97 | DULAI Agam | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | KULKARNI Karan | 17% | 53% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 99 | CHENG Maxwell | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 100 | TSATURYAN Simon | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 101 | SEO Juwan | 31% | 46% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 102 | DULAI Angad | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.