Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHI Julia | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 2 | LAURI Keira | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 3 | KHAN Alissa | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 3 | FAVO Isabella | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 5 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 6 | HUANG Rachael | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
| 7 | CASTELO Soleil | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 8 | LEOU Korina | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 9 | TENG EMMA | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 10 | ZHANG Sophie | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 11 | WU Yuwei | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 12 | BROWN Aria | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | AWAD Royce | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | MARYASH Samantha | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 15 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 16 | WANG yining | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 17 | NAYAK Esha | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 18 | HU Anna | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 19 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 20 | SUVOROVA Anna | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 21 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 22 | LIU Kelly | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 23 | PRESANTH Nandana | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 24 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 25 | GENTILE Vittoria | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 27 | LI Sonia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | FUNG Iris | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 29 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 30 | LEE Kaitlin | 3% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LEE Alyson | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | PROBASCO Leila | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | SPEARS Mya B | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 34 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 35 | SHMULER Fiona | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 36 | MACKAY Katherine | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | BARROSO Isabela | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | NAYAK Antara | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 39 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | CROOKS Riley | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 41 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 42 | KWON Ava | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 2% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 44 | ALAMI Amira | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | QIU Katherine | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 46 | BAINS Nandini | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 49 | BERRIOS Catalina | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | VATS Ishita | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | REN Katherine | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | INSINGA Ava | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | MAK Kaitlin | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 54 | KNOBEL Sophia | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 55 | KIM Audrey | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | NEDOPAKA Kateryna | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 57 | FLATT Sophia | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 58 | MYAT Chloe | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 59 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 60 | LAGOON Miriam | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | CHI Claire | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 62 | BARNES Sarah | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 64 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | CHAN Isla | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 66 | HUANG Pierra | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | LIM Alexa J. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | VALENCIA Sadie | 3% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 69 | LAFFY Lily | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | NG Sophia | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | GUHA Surabhi | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | NANDA Maanika | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | PARK Haylie | 12% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | GONZALEZ Veronika | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 75 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | WONG Charlene | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | GETZONI Mary | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.